Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 4:29:41 GMT -5
She reflects on the student's difficulty in seeing usefulness in their learning and encourages interdisciplinarity to demonstrate the transversality between subjects and, as a result, their practical application in life. Finally, she returns to her initial argument, about the importance of sensitivity, and criticizes traditional teaching for focusing on only a few skills, highlighting how this can affect the emotions of children who do not excel in “academic” skills, but have talent. in others disregarded by the current system, “everyone has a skill, the problem is that the school does not always value this skill that [the student] has”. Lastly, Prof. André Gan, coordinator of Colégio La Salle Abel, who expanded on the issue of sensitivity. He began by quoting two phrases from his colleague, Marlene: “education is made of affection, affinity and good memories” and “we need to overcome the practices of disciplinary captivity.
Like the other speakers, he draws attention to the importance of interdisciplinarity and adds the need to break the construction of an educational hierarchy. He proposes the idea of reversing the roles of the educational environment, allowing, or rather encouraging, the student to bring new information and knowledge to the teacher. Furthermore, Gan emphasizes that there is no definitive rule or format to end this “captivity”, however, there are basic questions that USA Phone Number can be considered. According to him, there are three words that establish creative education, they are: analysis, synthesis and evaluation. From these, the teacher reinforces the importance of understanding the environment and adapting teaching to the student, based on the way each individual has to learn.
Focusing on the area of assessment, André mentions the “famous red pen”, denouncing the so-called “culture of punishment” and stating that this need to “shape” the student impedes their creative development. Professor Alexander ends the panel by reinforcing the importance of reevaluating current teaching and focusing on the student first. He draws attention to the fact that the pandemic generated a change in the content delivery format, requiring a new educational process, and that this moment of change must be used. The debate in general was extremely interesting and informative, with all speakers adding questions and arguments in a way that was accessible to all audiences, broadening the discussion beyond academia.
Like the other speakers, he draws attention to the importance of interdisciplinarity and adds the need to break the construction of an educational hierarchy. He proposes the idea of reversing the roles of the educational environment, allowing, or rather encouraging, the student to bring new information and knowledge to the teacher. Furthermore, Gan emphasizes that there is no definitive rule or format to end this “captivity”, however, there are basic questions that USA Phone Number can be considered. According to him, there are three words that establish creative education, they are: analysis, synthesis and evaluation. From these, the teacher reinforces the importance of understanding the environment and adapting teaching to the student, based on the way each individual has to learn.
Focusing on the area of assessment, André mentions the “famous red pen”, denouncing the so-called “culture of punishment” and stating that this need to “shape” the student impedes their creative development. Professor Alexander ends the panel by reinforcing the importance of reevaluating current teaching and focusing on the student first. He draws attention to the fact that the pandemic generated a change in the content delivery format, requiring a new educational process, and that this moment of change must be used. The debate in general was extremely interesting and informative, with all speakers adding questions and arguments in a way that was accessible to all audiences, broadening the discussion beyond academia.