|
|
Post by Nighthawk on Dec 22, 2010 21:17:06 GMT -5
*Sigh* The sad thing is, I know you can write a lot better than that. You just spelled horribly (grammer?  ) to annoy me. Whatever. I won't lock this thread. Just don't get too off topic. |
|
Thomas
Clumsy Fingers
Posts: 28
|
Post by Thomas on Dec 22, 2010 21:30:44 GMT -5
By the way Nighthawk Capitilization isnt spelling it's a "Grammatical Rule" like First word capitilized in a sentence, not spelling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nighthawk on Dec 22, 2010 22:39:22 GMT -5
.....uh...... When I said, "(grammer? )" I was referring to the fact that you spelled it wrong.... And you actually don't know how to spell it...... It's spelled gramm ar. |
|
|
|
Post by mantor4 on Dec 23, 2010 23:17:25 GMT -5
But think about it; what would you be changing through time travel? Just being there in the past, couldn't it alter something drastically? And even if we had time travel, wouldn't we know by now? People in the future who have time travel could and would have traveled back to us already. The fact they haven't just goes to show that there will be no time travel in the future. TL;DR, no time travelers now = no time travel ever
|
|
) to annoy me. Whatever. I won't lock this thread. Just don't get too off topic.